Government of India on 8th Nov
2016 announced discontinuation of 500 & 1000 currency bill. The vision and
mission was to eradicate Black Money, Corruption, Terror Funding and many more.
By opting for Demonetization Drive, government took risk of complete business
paralysis for next 3 to 4 months. The recent PMI and service index shows
contraction and it is going to impact FY17 GDP dearly.
The discontinued currency bills
constitute 86% of the total floating currency bill and estimated that around 15.5 lakh crore is in the circulation. As per
the report 13 lakh crore is already deposited in the bank and it's expected
that another lakh crore will be deposited till the set deadline by the
government.
At the start of Demonetization
Drive, GoI expected that around 3 to 4 lakh crore will go out of circulation
but it seems impossible now.
It raises following queries:
- Did government over estimated Black Money Circulation Amount?
- Did Black Money hoarders used the acceptance of old currencies in Hospitals, petrol pumps, Medicine shop as tool to get their money converted?
- Was it worthwhile to take the economic hit by opting for Demonetization Drive?
Whatever is the outcome but
biggest brownie point of the Drive is the clear message to common people that
government is serious about Black Money, Corruption and illegal business
practices and will not hesitate to act against offenders. Both the direct and
indirect tax offenders are scared that they are monitored by one or another way
which will force many new addition of
direct and indirect tax payers.
The clear message by the
government that they are aware about the misuse of millions of Jan Dhan Yojana account
out of total 258.5 million account holders and action will be initiated is a
major win of the Drive. It is widely expected that GoI will initiate against
Gold Hoarders and benami property as step 2 and 3 , henceforth common citizens
should not think that that GoI is losing Demonetization Drive as government
enforcement agencies are investing sudden surge in Deposits.
yup action should be taken against benami property also ..........
ReplyDelete